THE NEWS GAZETTE
INTER-NATIONALE
Sunday: 17 April 2006
IPI : Over this past week many have been taken by much surprise as the names in both the Congress and the Senate have adopted plans of slavery much like that of the early American history associated with African Americans.
This type of slavery which many have referred to as EBS, that is Economic Based Slavery which
of course has been spearheaded by the economic community in search of better waged or a
much cheaper labor force for the business of America.
What may surprise some is that this type of wage reduction is occurring throughout Europe and other economies that seem to be driven by the so-called democratic nations. If one were to research the economic ties of the then Roman Empire they would discover that Rome endorsed
a slave-based workforce much like that which the America is now in riots by the Mexican illegals as they have been termed. Many claim this has to do with the future voting block of the Mexican
voters, however, in America one must be a citizen in order to cast a vote - does this sound too familiar to that of the plight of the African American which also were brought to America as a base for slave labor but denied the rights of the common man/American? What would be the difference between a people brought against their will from their homeland and a homeland that oppressed it's people with low or no wage thereby having them seek refuge into another country defying all odds of survival across the hot desert to reach a better place for them and their families? Others claim that as the Mexican has found his way into America it has helped the plight of the American farmer whose work is mostly done by modern machinery, but in looking closer at the American business it would not take such a hard look to find the illegals are working in middle class American jobs such as the Postal fields and other jobs which have been revered as the jobs awaiting those soldiers who have participated in the defense and war of the American and world peoples, they have an extreme time coming mentally in trying to understand the same government which sent them to war have now given up those jobs they once cherished
from an honourable service to an illegal worker.
One of the problems cited by the American government is that of the plight of the children born to the illegal parents while in America. It seems they are, that is the children have become by proxy or birth a legalized citizen of the United States and thus retain all benefits as that of any other American. As a declared problem, it seems none are capable to "fix" the problem. One solution, although not a popular one, is to cause all the companies that knowingly or unknowinly
hired or participated in such a workforce as the illegal worker should be required by law to support all children born in America in that childs native homeland to the equivilant of a monthly child support of a divorced couple in the courts of America. This proposal would work somewhat like that established in each individual state in the United States, for example if the parent were to abandon his child for whatever purpose he/she might be required by law to pay an amount of US $600.00 dollars a month to the parents of that child or the caretaker of that child in Mexico for example or whatever country is affected until his 18th or 25th birthdate as long as the child is in school. Any medical expense would be borne by that same company which had previously employed the illegal parent and would also support that same parent to seek legal re-entry into the United States. It seems a good idea until you consider the voter options and the riots now being ensued throughout the country - Europeans need be aware - this could be coming to a land near us.
In both parties it seems apparent at this time that the two major backers of keeping the illegal workforce, that is the slavelabor, in America is strongly endorsed by Republican and Democrats
alike, which is an odd fellowship concerning slaves and one that will be determinal to both parties either way they choose. The then President Clinton and the alliance of the now President George Bush have indeed created what is termed a political "quagmire" that seems to provide no base of resolution. Many of the Republican and for that point many of the Democrats have stated their voting days are at an end as they have lost jobs and wages and rights of employment to an illegal workforce (shades of France?), but this will remain to be seen come November which gives both parties very short time to amend their wrong and attract the voter back.
Amazingly, those who have weighed in as champions of the poor, afflicted, and slavery are on the same ticket as others, one such is that of the Sen. Ted Kennedy of Mass. and perhaps (we
await to see) that of the presidental hopeful Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York. Oddfellows indeed.
ipi
THE NEWS GAZETTE
INTER-NATIONALE
Sunday: 17 April 2006
IPI : Over this past week many have been taken by much surprise as the names in both the Congress and the Senate have adopted plans of slavery much like that of the early American history associated with African Americans.
This type of slavery which many have referred to as EBS, that is Economic Based Slavery which
of course has been spearheaded by the economic community in search of better waged or a
much cheaper labor force for the business of America.
What may surprise some is that this type of wage reduction is occurring throughout Europe and other economies that seem to be driven by the so-called democratic nations. If one were to research the economic ties of the then Roman Empire they would discover that Rome endorsed
a slave-based workforce much like that which the America is now in riots by the Mexican illegals as they have been termed. Many claim this has to do with the future voting block of the Mexican
voters, however, in America one must be a citizen in order to cast a vote - does this sound too familiar to that of the plight of the African American which also were brought to America as a base for slave labor but denied the rights of the common man/American? What would be the difference between a people brought against their will from their homeland and a homeland that oppressed it's people with low or no wage thereby having them seek refuge into another country defying all odds of survival across the hot desert to reach a better place for them and their families? Others claim that as the Mexican has found his way into America it has helped the plight of the American farmer whose work is mostly done by modern machinery, but in looking closer at the American business it would not take such a hard look to find the illegals are working in middle class American jobs such as the Postal fields and other jobs which have been revered as the jobs awaiting those soldiers who have participated in the defense and war of the American and world peoples, they have an extreme time coming mentally in trying to understand the same government which sent them to war have now given up those jobs they once cherished
from an honourable service to an illegal worker.
One of the problems cited by the American government is that of the plight of the children born to the illegal parents while in America. It seems they are, that is the children have become by proxy or birth a legalized citizen of the United States and thus retain all benefits as that of any other American. As a declared problem, it seems none are capable to "fix" the problem. One solution, although not a popular one, is to cause all the companies that knowingly or unknowinly
hired or participated in such a workforce as the illegal worker should be required by law to support all children born in America in that childs native homeland to the equivilant of a monthly child support of a divorced couple in the courts of America. This proposal would work somewhat like that established in each individual state in the United States, for example if the parent were to abandon his child for whatever purpose he/she might be required by law to pay an amount of US $600.00 dollars a month to the parents of that child or the caretaker of that child in Mexico for example or whatever country is affected until his 18th or 25th birthdate as long as the child is in school. Any medical expense would be borne by that same company which had previously employed the illegal parent and would also support that same parent to seek legal re-entry into the United States. It seems a good idea until you consider the voter options and the riots now being ensued throughout the country - Europeans need be aware - this could be coming to a land near us.
In both parties it seems apparent at this time that the two major backers of keeping the illegal workforce, that is the slavelabor, in America is strongly endorsed by Republican and Democrats
alike, which is an odd fellowship concerning slaves and one that will be determinal to both parties either way they choose. The then President Clinton and the alliance of the now President George Bush have indeed created what is termed a political "quagmire" that seems to provide no base of resolution. Many of the Republican and for that point many of the Democrats have stated their voting days are at an end as they have lost jobs and wages and rights of employment to an illegal workforce (shades of France?), but this will remain to be seen come November which gives both parties very short time to amend their wrong and attract the voter back.
Amazingly, those who have weighed in as champions of the poor, afflicted, and slavery are on the same ticket as others, one such is that of the Sen. Ted Kennedy of Mass. and perhaps (we
await to see) that of the presidental hopeful Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York. Oddfellows indeed.
ipi
No comments:
Post a Comment