May 17, 1948+70=2018-7=
2011?
2011?
In the preview and search of a generation to execute a
timeframe, we can both locate and understand there are two that stand in the
forefront, one is the 40 year wandering in the Wilderness of Sin with the
leadership of Moses, the other is the 70 year captivity and it's end, sought by
Daniel. In our search, we can preclude that any generation short of 70 years is
to be ruled out for the simple reason that no event has taken place over the 60
+ years, so time has made it of non-effect. But what of the 70? First there was
no mention, persay, of the 40 year episode with Moses concerning a prophetic
overtone, with exception of the Song of Moses, however, take a look at Daniel
and it is loaded with prophecy after prophecy, with timeframe's denoted
throughout for Daniel, Daniel's people, and that of the Messiah and that of the
anti-christ. In the first chapter and the first verse, Nebuchadnezzar, the king
of Babylon came unto Jerusalem, and besieged it, now this is important in and of
itself as Nebuchadnezzar is illustrated as to what kingdom would seek to destroy
the Jewish peoples and Jerusalem. In the second verse the Lord has given unto
Nebuchadnezzar not only the king, but the vessels of the house of God, which he
then carried into the land of Shinar (also known as Iraq), so the backdrop is
portrayed as that of Babylon, the same is true in the book of Revelation chapter
16 as "great Babylon came in remembrance before God". The event of all manner of
sin found it's birthplace in Babylon from the tower of Babel in Genesis 11 and
now is come full circle, if you will, to the place where it began and where it
shall end - Babylon. Daniel is relaying this important information unto all
through the dreams, visions, and the visit of the angel Gabriel in chapter nine,
and then in the next chapter Daniel has been mourning for three full weeks (3
years for Israel in the Tribulation Period) and Daniel has eaten no pleasant
bread, no flesh nor wine, has not bathed or anointed himself, this being similar
to that of Israel as they will be made naked and destitute. He is interrupted
with the appearance of a man whose description is similar, if not that of Jesus
Christ, who had been prevented from coming to Daniel by the prince of the
kingdom of Persia, with the "p" in "prince" being a small or lower case
lettering, meaning the prince of Persia is also noted similar to that of the
"prince" in Daniel 9:27. As Israel will be destitute and broken in Tribulation
Period when they approach the end of the 3 full years, only the intervention of
Christ will prevent their total destruction, but make note this does not take
place until after the completeness of the three full weeks to occur. Note
also that the "prince of the kingdom of Persia" is not the only controlling
entity mentioned here, but also that of the "kings of Persia" the same is noted
for the anti-christ as he rules with ten kings over the entire world in the
tribulation period. Perhaps we should insert an interlude here, one that will
cause understanding to those who desire such knowledge.
timeframe, we can both locate and understand there are two that stand in the
forefront, one is the 40 year wandering in the Wilderness of Sin with the
leadership of Moses, the other is the 70 year captivity and it's end, sought by
Daniel. In our search, we can preclude that any generation short of 70 years is
to be ruled out for the simple reason that no event has taken place over the 60
+ years, so time has made it of non-effect. But what of the 70? First there was
no mention, persay, of the 40 year episode with Moses concerning a prophetic
overtone, with exception of the Song of Moses, however, take a look at Daniel
and it is loaded with prophecy after prophecy, with timeframe's denoted
throughout for Daniel, Daniel's people, and that of the Messiah and that of the
anti-christ. In the first chapter and the first verse, Nebuchadnezzar, the king
of Babylon came unto Jerusalem, and besieged it, now this is important in and of
itself as Nebuchadnezzar is illustrated as to what kingdom would seek to destroy
the Jewish peoples and Jerusalem. In the second verse the Lord has given unto
Nebuchadnezzar not only the king, but the vessels of the house of God, which he
then carried into the land of Shinar (also known as Iraq), so the backdrop is
portrayed as that of Babylon, the same is true in the book of Revelation chapter
16 as "great Babylon came in remembrance before God". The event of all manner of
sin found it's birthplace in Babylon from the tower of Babel in Genesis 11 and
now is come full circle, if you will, to the place where it began and where it
shall end - Babylon. Daniel is relaying this important information unto all
through the dreams, visions, and the visit of the angel Gabriel in chapter nine,
and then in the next chapter Daniel has been mourning for three full weeks (3
years for Israel in the Tribulation Period) and Daniel has eaten no pleasant
bread, no flesh nor wine, has not bathed or anointed himself, this being similar
to that of Israel as they will be made naked and destitute. He is interrupted
with the appearance of a man whose description is similar, if not that of Jesus
Christ, who had been prevented from coming to Daniel by the prince of the
kingdom of Persia, with the "p" in "prince" being a small or lower case
lettering, meaning the prince of Persia is also noted similar to that of the
"prince" in Daniel 9:27. As Israel will be destitute and broken in Tribulation
Period when they approach the end of the 3 full years, only the intervention of
Christ will prevent their total destruction, but make note this does not take
place until after the completeness of the three full weeks to occur. Note
also that the "prince of the kingdom of Persia" is not the only controlling
entity mentioned here, but also that of the "kings of Persia" the same is noted
for the anti-christ as he rules with ten kings over the entire world in the
tribulation period. Perhaps we should insert an interlude here, one that will
cause understanding to those who desire such knowledge.
Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he
revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets. Amos 3:7
revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets. Amos 3:7
Daniel makes notice unto Nebuchadnezzar that these
things will take place in the latter days, and then Daniel describes the
statue/image whose head was of fine gold, his breast and his arms of silver, his
belly and his thighs of brass, his legs of iron and his feet of part iron and
part of clay. At the time of the fulfillment of this image, a stone that was cut
out without hands or aided by human, brake the image to pieces and the stone
became a mountain and filled the entire earth. At the time of the kingdom of
iron, that kingdom shall be divided and shall become partly iron and partly clay
and shall intermingle with the seed of men, but division will cause them not to
mix one with another. Take a good look at Daniel 2:43 as it states the iron and
the clay will mingle with the "seed of men" so the timeframe by this phrase
alone, could only occur in today's timeframe as the DNA/seed of men, is used in
this event, and remember it did not state that it would be mingled with
men/women, but that it would be mingled with the "seed" of men, and that is used
only to denote offspring, or the children. In Deuteronomy 28:48 Moses instructs
the children of Israel that in their disobedience they shall wear a yoke of iron
upon their neck, another prophetic view of Rome in the latter days. The little
(p) prince in Daniel 9 bears repeating the verses,
things will take place in the latter days, and then Daniel describes the
statue/image whose head was of fine gold, his breast and his arms of silver, his
belly and his thighs of brass, his legs of iron and his feet of part iron and
part of clay. At the time of the fulfillment of this image, a stone that was cut
out without hands or aided by human, brake the image to pieces and the stone
became a mountain and filled the entire earth. At the time of the kingdom of
iron, that kingdom shall be divided and shall become partly iron and partly clay
and shall intermingle with the seed of men, but division will cause them not to
mix one with another. Take a good look at Daniel 2:43 as it states the iron and
the clay will mingle with the "seed of men" so the timeframe by this phrase
alone, could only occur in today's timeframe as the DNA/seed of men, is used in
this event, and remember it did not state that it would be mingled with
men/women, but that it would be mingled with the "seed" of men, and that is used
only to denote offspring, or the children. In Deuteronomy 28:48 Moses instructs
the children of Israel that in their disobedience they shall wear a yoke of iron
upon their neck, another prophetic view of Rome in the latter days. The little
(p) prince in Daniel 9 bears repeating the verses,
"Know
therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to
restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince
shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built
again, and the wall, even in troublous times. And after threescore and two weeks
shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the
people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and
the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the
end of the war desolations are determined. And he shall
confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in
the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to
cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make
it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be
poured upon the desolate." Daniel
9:25-27
therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to
restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince
shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built
again, and the wall, even in troublous times. And after threescore and two weeks
shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the
people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and
the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the
end of the war desolations are determined. And he shall
confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in
the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to
cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make
it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be
poured upon the desolate." Daniel
9:25-27
The problematic verses are highlighted in purple
for the Messiah and red for the small prince whose identity many have strayed
into confusion, however, just as equally important is what he shall do, and
would this be the same for Christ, in modern slang, WWJD just What Would Jesus
Do? Is this important to you? Only if you choose to want to know the truth, as
opposed to believing a lie, but lets explore what the Bible states about the
truth of God and the lies of men/women:
for the Messiah and red for the small prince whose identity many have strayed
into confusion, however, just as equally important is what he shall do, and
would this be the same for Christ, in modern slang, WWJD just What Would Jesus
Do? Is this important to you? Only if you choose to want to know the truth, as
opposed to believing a lie, but lets explore what the Bible states about the
truth of God and the lies of men/women:
"If we receive the witness of men, the
witness of God is greater: for this is the witness of
God which he hath testified of his Son." l John 5:9
witness of God is greater: for this is the witness of
God which he hath testified of his Son." l John 5:9
First, look at
the verse attributed unto the Messiah, there is the timeframe of 70 weeks, but
the Messiah shall be cutoff after 69 weeks, but not for Himself (He came to
offer His life for you, and of course, my state of sin). After threescore and
two weeks or 62 weeks, He is cutoff as the seven weeks are used to restore and
build Jerusalem and then 62 more weeks until the Messiah is to be cutoff, making
a total of 69 weeks.
the verse attributed unto the Messiah, there is the timeframe of 70 weeks, but
the Messiah shall be cutoff after 69 weeks, but not for Himself (He came to
offer His life for you, and of course, my state of sin). After threescore and
two weeks or 62 weeks, He is cutoff as the seven weeks are used to restore and
build Jerusalem and then 62 more weeks until the Messiah is to be cutoff, making
a total of 69 weeks.
Second, the
"prince" or his people that is, shall come and shall destroy the city and the
sanctuary - if this is Christ (which it is not) then that would mean the
Christians and the disciples would commit to destruction which flies in the face
of everything Christ taught including, turning the other cheek, and that all the
disciples must die for Christ's sake (even John the Beloved in the Tribulation)
and by the way, the Christians were falsely blamed for the burning of Rome. He
shall confirm the covenant for one week, that being seven years for the people,
and in doing so will make them to sacrifice animals and oblations and then
suddenly make them stop the sacrifices and oblations. Oblations are prayers,
Christ commanded us to pray always, and He stated He was the sacrifice to be
once offered for the sins of the people, if on the other hand He confirmed the
sacrifice by the covenant for one week, then He was the one who started the
animal sacrifice, which He also condemned at His arrival. The sacrifice was
already in place, well before Christ was born by Mary, so He did not confirm
this type of a covenant as told above, He did, however, stop the sacrifice for
those whom accepted Him, as the once and for all perfect sacrifice, however, the
Jews kept sacrifices of the animals going until at least 65 AD.
Now here comes the rub, Christ somehow magically, symbolically, did not
mean the animal sacrifices for the people, after He went to the cross, should
continue and that the Christians should not continue to sacrifice animals, but
He did mean the literal sacrifices of the animals, before His advent to the
cross, but for only a timeframe of three years which He or someone forgot to
tell the Jewish people to hold off sacrifices until His 30th birthday, and then
let Him confirm a covenant with them for sacrifice, so He could stop it when He
turned 33 years old, this is called the children's hour of make believe and
story telling, but it should not be heard of, nor permitted among the sincere
Christians of the world, it is a lie. In other words before the cross it was ok
for the Jews to sacrifice animals, as Christ needed to put a halt to this kind
of sacrifice when He went to the cross, but after He went to the cross the
Christians should no longer sacrifice. So before the cross the effect was on the
Jew and after the cross it became the Christian, but the Jew to whom Daniel
stated that the little "p" prince, would stop the sacrifice in the "midst of the
week" did not stop, but continued in their sacrifice until 65 AD, as I stated
someone forgot to tell Daniel it was not about his people, the Jews, but as soon
as Christ would go to the cross, it would be about the Gentiles, notice how
tangled a lie must become for "religious" groups? However, look at Daniel 9:24
and how these "religious" denominations claim that the angel nor God knew what
they were proclaiming:
"prince" or his people that is, shall come and shall destroy the city and the
sanctuary - if this is Christ (which it is not) then that would mean the
Christians and the disciples would commit to destruction which flies in the face
of everything Christ taught including, turning the other cheek, and that all the
disciples must die for Christ's sake (even John the Beloved in the Tribulation)
and by the way, the Christians were falsely blamed for the burning of Rome. He
shall confirm the covenant for one week, that being seven years for the people,
and in doing so will make them to sacrifice animals and oblations and then
suddenly make them stop the sacrifices and oblations. Oblations are prayers,
Christ commanded us to pray always, and He stated He was the sacrifice to be
once offered for the sins of the people, if on the other hand He confirmed the
sacrifice by the covenant for one week, then He was the one who started the
animal sacrifice, which He also condemned at His arrival. The sacrifice was
already in place, well before Christ was born by Mary, so He did not confirm
this type of a covenant as told above, He did, however, stop the sacrifice for
those whom accepted Him, as the once and for all perfect sacrifice, however, the
Jews kept sacrifices of the animals going until at least 65 AD.
Now here comes the rub, Christ somehow magically, symbolically, did not
mean the animal sacrifices for the people, after He went to the cross, should
continue and that the Christians should not continue to sacrifice animals, but
He did mean the literal sacrifices of the animals, before His advent to the
cross, but for only a timeframe of three years which He or someone forgot to
tell the Jewish people to hold off sacrifices until His 30th birthday, and then
let Him confirm a covenant with them for sacrifice, so He could stop it when He
turned 33 years old, this is called the children's hour of make believe and
story telling, but it should not be heard of, nor permitted among the sincere
Christians of the world, it is a lie. In other words before the cross it was ok
for the Jews to sacrifice animals, as Christ needed to put a halt to this kind
of sacrifice when He went to the cross, but after He went to the cross the
Christians should no longer sacrifice. So before the cross the effect was on the
Jew and after the cross it became the Christian, but the Jew to whom Daniel
stated that the little "p" prince, would stop the sacrifice in the "midst of the
week" did not stop, but continued in their sacrifice until 65 AD, as I stated
someone forgot to tell Daniel it was not about his people, the Jews, but as soon
as Christ would go to the cross, it would be about the Gentiles, notice how
tangled a lie must become for "religious" groups? However, look at Daniel 9:24
and how these "religious" denominations claim that the angel nor God knew what
they were proclaiming:
"Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people
and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins,
and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting
righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most
Holy." Daniel 9:24
and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins,
and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting
righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most
Holy." Daniel 9:24
The entirety of the 70 weeks were for Daniels "people",
Daniels "holy city" but these religious denomination are offended by the literal
translation and have to change them symbolically, but guess what, they have to
change every word in the Bible to symbolic meaning, as they keep stumbling over
the stone of offense.
Daniels "holy city" but these religious denomination are offended by the literal
translation and have to change them symbolically, but guess what, they have to
change every word in the Bible to symbolic meaning, as they keep stumbling over
the stone of offense.
Third, Christ
did not come to setup another form of sacrifice than that of Himself, and made
this very appearant in Matthew 26 as Christ prays to the Father to show if there
is another way, other than the cross, to reveal it, this, He showed there was no
other way, but the cross. Christ never commanded His followers at anytime to
destroy the city and the sanctuary, and to show that was not symbolic, He stated
that the stones would not be left one upon another in Jerusalem, which also was
semi-concluded, but not all were removed one from another, considering the
Western or Wailing Wall. Christ commanded we should pray always and did not
cause the oblations to cease. Christ did not command animal sacrifice which the
Jews were doing before Christ's birth and 35 years after the cross. Christ did
not make Jerusalem desolate for the "overspreading of abominations" but for the
Jews not accepting Him when He came, was the only reason. Christ did, however,
acknowledge the small "p" prince that would come after He was
gone:
did not come to setup another form of sacrifice than that of Himself, and made
this very appearant in Matthew 26 as Christ prays to the Father to show if there
is another way, other than the cross, to reveal it, this, He showed there was no
other way, but the cross. Christ never commanded His followers at anytime to
destroy the city and the sanctuary, and to show that was not symbolic, He stated
that the stones would not be left one upon another in Jerusalem, which also was
semi-concluded, but not all were removed one from another, considering the
Western or Wailing Wall. Christ commanded we should pray always and did not
cause the oblations to cease. Christ did not command animal sacrifice which the
Jews were doing before Christ's birth and 35 years after the cross. Christ did
not make Jerusalem desolate for the "overspreading of abominations" but for the
Jews not accepting Him when He came, was the only reason. Christ did, however,
acknowledge the small "p" prince that would come after He was
gone:
"Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for
the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me." John
14:30
Just like Daniel, Christ, identified the "prince" as evil and having
nothing in Christ, the prince is the true anti-Christ, however, as then and now,
men/women try to make this anti-Christ to be that of Christ, irregardless of
what both Daniel and Christ stated about this prince of evil, but Christ
acknowledged this too would occur.
the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me." John
14:30
Just like Daniel, Christ, identified the "prince" as evil and having
nothing in Christ, the prince is the true anti-Christ, however, as then and now,
men/women try to make this anti-Christ to be that of Christ, irregardless of
what both Daniel and Christ stated about this prince of evil, but Christ
acknowledged this too would occur.
" But I know you, that ye have not the love of
God in you. I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another
shall come in his own name, him ye will receive. How can ye believe,
which receive honour one of another, and seek not the honour that
cometh from God only?" John 5:42-44
Paul noted that these type of people
come together under "religion" and make for themselves their own form of belief,
and then compare themselves one to another as being affirmed, but this is to
their own destruction, not accepting the truth of God, but accepting the persons
of man/woman as some greater degree of knowledge than that of Christ's own
words.
God in you. I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another
shall come in his own name, him ye will receive. How can ye believe,
which receive honour one of another, and seek not the honour that
cometh from God only?" John 5:42-44
Paul noted that these type of people
come together under "religion" and make for themselves their own form of belief,
and then compare themselves one to another as being affirmed, but this is to
their own destruction, not accepting the truth of God, but accepting the persons
of man/woman as some greater degree of knowledge than that of Christ's own
words.
"For we dare not make ourselves of the number,
or compare ourselves with some that commend themselves: but they measuring
themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among
themselves, are not wise." 2 Corinthians 10:12
or compare ourselves with some that commend themselves: but they measuring
themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among
themselves, are not wise." 2 Corinthians 10:12
Why do men/women perfer other teachers than that
of the Holy Spirit, it can be for only a couple of reasons, both end in
rebellion and denial of God's Word, one is laziness, and the other is the amount
of time and prayer it takes to allow God's Word and understanding to come from
Him only.
of the Holy Spirit, it can be for only a couple of reasons, both end in
rebellion and denial of God's Word, one is laziness, and the other is the amount
of time and prayer it takes to allow God's Word and understanding to come from
Him only.
"For the time will come when they will not
endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves
teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the
truth, and shall be turned unto fables. But watch thou in all things, endure
afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry." 2
Timothy 4:3-5
endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves
teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the
truth, and shall be turned unto fables. But watch thou in all things, endure
afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry." 2
Timothy 4:3-5
The problem of Symbolic interpretation is
the same as that of the unknown tongue, you must take someone else's
interpretation, as to what is meant, but if the blind lead the blind. A good
example heard day in and out on the radio is the affirming of a certain word
from the Bible quoted in Greek or Hebrew, from someone whom has no degree in
either Greek or Hebrew, and who have an audience, who neither know Greek nor
Hebrew, nor if the stated interpretation is accurate, just as the speaker
him/herself does not know if the book they are quoting from, and that being an
interpreter's definition of Greek to English and Hebrew to English, is accurate,
these are wasted words spoken wastefully to an audience who do not wish to hear
either the Greek nor the Hebrew, as they speak and hear English, so why do they
do this? Purely to impress others that they know the Greek and the Hebrew which
they know not, did you ever try to bluff your way through a subject matter with
some of the associates or friends, that you have or do communicate with,
only to have them affirm you are absolutely correct, yet you
know you are both liars, however, you may get by with one or more of these
associates,as your gift of garbled gab convinced them that you knew what you
were talking about, now multiply this with someone who affirms a matter,by
stating that in Revelation,God uses symbolic language and therefore they have
liberty to do the same, and you cannot question them, because only they can
the same as that of the unknown tongue, you must take someone else's
interpretation, as to what is meant, but if the blind lead the blind. A good
example heard day in and out on the radio is the affirming of a certain word
from the Bible quoted in Greek or Hebrew, from someone whom has no degree in
either Greek or Hebrew, and who have an audience, who neither know Greek nor
Hebrew, nor if the stated interpretation is accurate, just as the speaker
him/herself does not know if the book they are quoting from, and that being an
interpreter's definition of Greek to English and Hebrew to English, is accurate,
these are wasted words spoken wastefully to an audience who do not wish to hear
either the Greek nor the Hebrew, as they speak and hear English, so why do they
do this? Purely to impress others that they know the Greek and the Hebrew which
they know not, did you ever try to bluff your way through a subject matter with
some of the associates or friends, that you have or do communicate with,
only to have them affirm you are absolutely correct, yet you
know you are both liars, however, you may get by with one or more of these
associates,as your gift of garbled gab convinced them that you knew what you
were talking about, now multiply this with someone who affirms a matter,by
stating that in Revelation,God uses symbolic language and therefore they have
liberty to do the same, and you cannot question them, because only they can
know what they know, more than you can know, what it
is you think you know. You may as well make an eagle a cow, or a horse a duck,
when one makes "assumptions" that God is a space cowboy riding the range of
heaven and point to Ezekiel chapter one as evidence, but do
not catch the phrase, " the appearance of the likeness
of the glory of the LORD" but they assume and do not point out the word
"likeness" and they have accomplished an entire posse riding that sky range with
themselves, sound weird and not likely? Not if your name is Applewhite and lying
around your lifeless body are other "heaven's gate" dead wannabes, chasing the
meteor of suicide, or perhaps you followed a man named Jim
Jones or David Koresh, they did not get such a large following by being totally
ignorant, just devotee's who would not study for themselves, but played that
ever popular game, "Follow the Leader". Remember when you were a child
and there was always one who wanted to be a captain, the leader, the commander
in all your childhood games, he/she is now a minister so-called.
is you think you know. You may as well make an eagle a cow, or a horse a duck,
when one makes "assumptions" that God is a space cowboy riding the range of
heaven and point to Ezekiel chapter one as evidence, but do
not catch the phrase, " the appearance of the likeness
of the glory of the LORD" but they assume and do not point out the word
"likeness" and they have accomplished an entire posse riding that sky range with
themselves, sound weird and not likely? Not if your name is Applewhite and lying
around your lifeless body are other "heaven's gate" dead wannabes, chasing the
meteor of suicide, or perhaps you followed a man named Jim
Jones or David Koresh, they did not get such a large following by being totally
ignorant, just devotee's who would not study for themselves, but played that
ever popular game, "Follow the Leader". Remember when you were a child
and there was always one who wanted to be a captain, the leader, the commander
in all your childhood games, he/she is now a minister so-called.
"For such are false
apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of
Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be
transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to
their works." 2 Corinthians
11:13-15
God has given you His Word, and if it is not of literal
interpretation, then how could God judge anyone for not knowing His Word? Now is
the track laid for the blanket salvation crowd, whom also interpret, you are
right - Symbolically!
apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of
Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be
transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to
their works." 2 Corinthians
11:13-15
God has given you His Word, and if it is not of literal
interpretation, then how could God judge anyone for not knowing His Word? Now is
the track laid for the blanket salvation crowd, whom also interpret, you are
right - Symbolically!
Christ was unaware of what He
prophesied?
prophesied?
Peter and James and John and Andrew asked Him
privately, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign when
all these things shall be fulfilled?
privately, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign when
all these things shall be fulfilled?
Mark 13 - all
"And the gospel must first be published among all
nations." Mark 13:10
nations." Mark 13:10
"Now the brother shall betray the brother to death, and
the father the son; and children shall rise up against their parents, and shall
cause them to be put to death." Mark 13:12
the father the son; and children shall rise up against their parents, and shall
cause them to be put to death." Mark 13:12
"But when ye shall see the abomination of desolation,
spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not, (let him that
readeth understand,) then let them that be in Judaea flee to the mountains:"
Mark 13:14
spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not, (let him that
readeth understand,) then let them that be in Judaea flee to the mountains:"
Mark 13:14
"For in those days shall be affliction, such as was not
from the beginning of the creation which God created unto this time, neither
shall be. And except that the Lord had shortened those days, no flesh should be
saved: but for the elect's sake, whom he hath chosen, he hath shortened the
days." Mark 13:19-20
"But in those days, after that
tribulation, the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light,
And the stars of heaven shall fall, and the powers that are in heaven shall be
shaken. And then shall they see the
Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory. And
then shall he send his angels, and shall gather
together his elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to
the uttermost part of heaven." Mark 13:24-27
from the beginning of the creation which God created unto this time, neither
shall be. And except that the Lord had shortened those days, no flesh should be
saved: but for the elect's sake, whom he hath chosen, he hath shortened the
days." Mark 13:19-20
"But in those days, after that
tribulation, the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light,
And the stars of heaven shall fall, and the powers that are in heaven shall be
shaken. And then shall they see the
Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory. And
then shall he send his angels, and shall gather
together his elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to
the uttermost part of heaven." Mark 13:24-27
If these have already occurred then you are awaiting
judgment into hell, as the elect would have already been taken to
heaven.
"For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are
written may be fulfilled. But woe unto them that are with child, and to them
that give suck, in those days! for there shall be great distress in the land,
and wrath upon this people. And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and
shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down
of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled." Luke
21:22-24
judgment into hell, as the elect would have already been taken to
heaven.
"For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are
written may be fulfilled. But woe unto them that are with child, and to them
that give suck, in those days! for there shall be great distress in the land,
and wrath upon this people. And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and
shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down
of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled." Luke
21:22-24
Jews are led away captive into all nations - until the
times of the Gentiles be fulfilled - Did you know that the Gentile nations are
still in charge of the world and have been for the past 2000 years, but the Jew
that was led away captive are returning to their homeland from whence they were
dispearsed. Your redemption, if you are a Christian occurs after the sun, moon,
stars,etc.., and the generation that beholds this shall not pass away til all
these come to pass, in 2018 that generation of 70 years will have passed away,
minus 7 years of course for the tribulation period.
times of the Gentiles be fulfilled - Did you know that the Gentile nations are
still in charge of the world and have been for the past 2000 years, but the Jew
that was led away captive are returning to their homeland from whence they were
dispearsed. Your redemption, if you are a Christian occurs after the sun, moon,
stars,etc.., and the generation that beholds this shall not pass away til all
these come to pass, in 2018 that generation of 70 years will have passed away,
minus 7 years of course for the tribulation period.
