
Syria agrees to attend Mideast talks
Israel says Arab nations can’t dictate terms of this week’s Mideast summit
updated 2:18 p.m. ET, Sun., Nov. 25, 2007
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration was able to declare a clean sweep when Syria, the last Arab world holdout, said Sunday it would attend this week’s high-stakes Mideast peace conference. Top negotiators awaited a meeting with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to finalize details. The White House reacted to Syria’s last-minute announcement by trying to keep the focus on the broad list of participants. "We welcome the attendance of so many countries from the region and around the world," said Gordon Johndroe, spokesman for President Bush’s National Security Council. "This large number signals broad support for Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts." As 16 Arab nations and the Arab League prepared to sit down with Israel for the first time in more than a decade, Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni made it clear they should not expect to dictate the contours of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. League members grudgingly agreed a few days ago to send their foreign ministers to the conference, meant to renew Israeli-Palestinian peace talks after a violent, seven-year lull in negotiations. Most members do not have ties with the Jewish state. Syria had threatened to skip the three-day meetings in Annapolis, Md., and Washington, if they did not address the Golan Heights, a strategic plateau Israel captured from Syria in the 1967 Mideast war and later annexed. But with that issue added to the agenda, the deputy foreign minister, Faysal Mekdad, will participate, according to Syria’s state-run news agency. White House press secretary Dana Perino, however, said the Golan Heights issue is "not specifically on the agenda." Participants can raise various issues, she said. Rice has said the United States would give room for other regional conflicts to be aired at the conference, including the Golan Heights. "If Syria chooses to come and wants to speak to its issues ... certainly nobody is going to rule it out of order," she said last week.
Israel PM welcomes Syria attendanceNonetheless, the absence of Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem appeared to indicate that Syria was not entirely confident the conference would address its concerns over the territory. Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert saw the appearance of a high-ranking Syrian official as a positive development. "The meetings are clearly about the Israeli-Palestinian process, but could be the beginning of new avenues to peace in the Middle East," said the prime minister’s spokeswoman, Miri Eisin. On the flight to Washington with Livni, Olmert said Israel would "favorably" consider negotiations with Syria if conditions ripened. Israel first wants Syria to break out of Iran’s orbit and stop harboring Palestinian and Lebanese militants opposed to Israel’s existence. Surveying past peace efforts, Livni suggested that a lack of Arab backing contributed to the failure of the last round of Israeli-Palestinian talks, which collapsed amid bloodshed in early 2001. The Arab world, she said, "should stop sitting on the fence." "There isn’t a single Palestinian who can reach an agreement without Arab support," she said. "That’s one of the lessons we learned seven years ago." But, Livni added, "it is not the role of the Arab world to define the terms of the negotiations or take part in them."
Preparations to be finalized SundayRice planned to host the top negotiators, Livni and Palestinian envoy Ahmed Qureia, on Sunday evening in an effort to finalize preparations, according to Palestinian negotiator Yasser Abed Rabbo. He hoped to work out a joint document, but said an agreement was not essential because of assurances received in the U.S. invitation to the conference. That invitation, he said, "includes all the terms of reference for the future negotiation" and "confirms that both sides are committed" to putting in place the peace process. "This is enough to launch negotiations after the conference."
Reluctance to attend summitArab states had been reluctant to attend the gathering, which starts Monday in Washington. They feared it would give Israel a public-relations boost while yielding little political benefit for the Palestinians. But they decided to come to the first large-scale Arab-Israeli gathering since a 1996 meeting in Egypt. That is largely because they wanted to bolster moderate Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and keep him from making damaging concessions to Israel in talks that are to follow the conference. Abbas has been badly weakened by the Islamic Hamas group’s violent takeover of the Gaza Strip in June, which left him in control of just the West Bank. A Hamas spokesman, Sami Abu Zuhri, said Hamas would have preferred if the Arabs collectively did not go to the conference, but he refused to criticize Syria. "The Syrian leadership is the one to evaluate its own interests, the way it sees fit," he said. The Arab League has proposed offering normalized ties with Israel if the Jewish state cedes all land captured in the 1967 Mideast war and agrees to a solution for Palestinian refugees who lost their homes in Israel following the country’s founding in 1948. Israel opposes a complete territorial pullback and the repatriation of Palestinian refugees to Israel. It initially rejected the Arab proposal, first presented in 2002. But over the past year Olmert has said it could be useful in new talks.
Last-ditch effortAhead of the conference, Israeli and Palestinian delegations were making a last-ditch effort to nail down agreement on where the talks would head after this week. The Palestinians want the joint statement to address, at least in general terms, the central issues of final borders, claims to Jerusalem and the fate of Palestinian refugees. Israel wants a broader and vaguer statement that would allow more room for maneuvering. It says the haggling on those issues should take place in the private talks that are to begin after the conference concludes on Wednesday. "I hope Annapolis will allow the launching of serious negotiations on all the core issues that will lead to a solution of two states for two peoples," Olmert told reporters on the plane. Abbas acknowledged that negotiations on the joint statement were in trouble. "The positions with the Israelis before Annapolis are still far apart, and the negotiations are still ongoing," Abbas said in comments published Sunday in the Palestinian newspaper al-Ayyam. Despite the differences, Abbas said he was committed to doing everything possible to hammer out an agreement in the coming year. Both Israel and the U.S. have said they hope to clinch a deal before Bush leaves office in January 2009.
Iran says it created nuke pellets
Pellets for use in heavy water reactor, which could be used for plutonium
updated 10:03 p.m. ET, Sat., Nov. 24, 2007
TEHRAN, Iran - The head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization said Saturday that the country had produced its first nuclear fuel pellets for use in a heavy water reactor, which is still under construction. The uranium oxide pellets are made using a process separate from the uranium enrichment at the heart of a standoff between Iran and the U.S., which accuses the clerical government of secretly pursuing a nuclear weapons program. But the Arak reactor, which began construction in central Iran in 2004, is a concern to the West because the spent fuel from a heavy-water facility can be used to produce plutonium, which in turn can be used for a nuclear weapon. U.N. inspectors last visited the reactor in July, and Iran has said it hopes to have Arak up and running by 2009. "Fuel pellets to be used in the 40-megawatt Arak research reactor have been produced," Iranian Vice President Gholam Reza Aghazadeh said, according to the official IRNA news agency. Iran is developing Arak parallel to its better-known light-water reactor program, like the one being built with Russian help at Bushehr. Such light-water reactors use enriched uranium that, at far higher levels of enrichment, can also be used to produce the fissile material for a nuclear weapon. Iran insists its nuclear program is solely for peaceful purposes including generating electricity. The U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, had no comment Saturday.
Iran leader: No nuke concessions
National newspaper blasts Ahmadinejad for his attacks on Iranian critics
updated 9:27 p.m. ET, Wed., Nov. 21, 2007
ARDABIL, Iran - President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad vowed again Wednesday not to make concessions to the West over Iran’s nuclear program, while an Iranian newspaper reproached the hard-line leader for his attacks on critics in the country’s conservative camp. Iranians overwhelmingly back Iran’s right to make use of nuclear energy, but criticism of Ahmadinejad has been growing in recent months over his confrontational approach to the U.S. and its allies in the dispute. Many people are also discontented over the poor economy. Jomhuri-e-Eslami, a daily aligned with Iran’s Islamic establishment, ran an editorial taking Ahmadinejad to task for calling former nuclear negotiator Hossein Mousavian a "traitor." It said the president was "wrong," and added that only courts should make such judgments. Although the president named Mousavian, his attack was widely viewed as being aimed at the envoy’s ally, former president Hashemi Rafsanjani, who is thought to be arguing for a more moderate stance in Iran’s dealings with the West. Rafsanjani has emerged as a leader of conservatives who once supported Ahmadinejad but have increasingly gone public with criticism of government policies. He also likely worries the president because he has some influence with Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has ultimate say over all issues, including the nuclear program. Earlier this month, Ahmadinejad branded critics of his handling of the nuclear issue as "traitors" and warned he would take action against them — a warning many saw as a volley against Rafsanjani’s camp. "It is not correct to take judgment about such issues to the press, universities and the public," Jomhuri-e-Eslami said in its editorial. It said Ahmadinejad should not interfere in judicial matters and suggested legal action should be taken against those who make allegations against individuals — a comment believed directed at the president.
Leader says Iran will work with U.N.Speaking at a rally in Ardabil, a city in the northwest, Ahmadinejad stood firm in rejecting calls for moderation in grappling with international pressure over the nuclear program. He said concessions would only result in more concessions being demanded further down the road. "They want to get a small concession from us — for instance, that we won’t go beyond a certain point within the next four years or we annually make just a certain amount of progress," he said. "This will become a legal precedent. Then, they will come and threaten us to obtain another concession." Ahmadinejad said Iran will not go beyond its current work with the U.N.’s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, based in Vienna, Austria. An IAEA report last week said Iran had cooperated in answering some questions about its past nuclear activities, but added that little is known about current work and that Tehran continues to defy a U.N. Security Council demand that it suspend uranium enrichment. Iran contends its enrichment program is meant solely for the production of fuel for nuclear reactors that would generate electricity. But the U.S. and its allies suspect the Iranians are secretly trying to develop atomic weapons.
Further meetingsIran’s state news agency, IRNA, said Wednesday that the country’s top nuclear negotiator and the European Union’s foreign policy chief would meet Nov. 30 in London for another round of talks. However, EU officials in Brussels, Belgium, suggested it was unlikely a meeting would be held that day. Earlier EU-Iranian talks have often been preceded by a series of dates floated by Tehran. EU envoy Javier Solana has been meeting with Iranian negotiator Saeed Jalili on behalf of the five Security Council members and Germany, which have led international efforts to persuade Tehran to curb its nuclear program in return for a package of economic incentives. In Vienna, an American diplomat expressed confidence Wednesday that the IAEA’s 35-nation board will urge Iran this week to obey the Security Council demands on enrichment as well as open its nuclear facilities fully to international scrutiny. Gregory L. Schulte, chief delegate to the U.N. agency, commented on the eve of the board’s two-day meeting to discuss the Iran situation. The U.S., Britain and France are pushing for a third round of U.N. sanctions over Iran’s failure to halt enrichment. But Russia and China, the Security Council’s two other veto-holding permanent members, argue that negotiations should be pursued further before more penalties are imposed.












